Dust is where you build the assistant. Fasrad is the assistant, already working.

Dust is where you build the assistant; Fasrad is the assistant, already working — inbox, calendar, and CRM, taking actions in four minutes.

Get your Dust alternative now — Live in 4 minutes

Skip the data-connection project. Get an agent with its own inbox, calendar, and CRM that takes actions in about four minutes.

Building an assistant vs. having one

Dust is a strong platform for technical teams that want to build custom AI assistants connected to their stack — Notion, Slack, GitHub, internal docs. You wire up the data sources, define the assistant, pick the model, and the people who do that work tend to be developers or ops engineers who enjoy it. Dust gives them real control over context and which data the model can see.

Fasrad starts from the other end. There is nothing to build. You name the agent, give it a personality, and it comes with a dedicated email inbox, a Google Calendar, Sheets and Drive, a CRM, and the ability to browse the web and call any REST API. It does not stop at answering questions about your data — it drafts the reply, books the slot, files the contact, and sends the follow-up next Tuesday because you told it to in plain English.

The difference is who does the work after the model produces an answer. With Dust, the assistant surfaces context and you act on it. With Fasrad, the agent holds the inbox and calendar and does the acting itself, then reports back.

Where the line falls:

Pick Dust if you have a technical team and the job is to give the whole company a governed assistant over internal knowledge. Pick Fasrad if you're one person or a small team who wants an agent that already does the outbound, the booking, and the follow-through without you building anything.

Related pages in this workflow

These pages cover the adjacent jobs buyers usually compare before choosing an AI agent.

Frequently asked questions

Isn't Dust the same thing — an AI agent over my data?

Dust is a platform to build assistants connected to your company data; the people setting it up are usually technical. Fasrad is the finished agent. You don't connect sources or pick a model — it comes with its own inbox, calendar, CRM, and web access, and it acts on them rather than just answering.

What does Dust still do better?

Governance and native source control. If you need fine-grained data permissions, audit trails, deep native connectors to Notion, Slack, and GitHub, and a managed assistant for an entire technical org, Dust is built for that and Fasrad is not. Fasrad reaches external systems through web browse and REST calls, which is broad but not the same as a vetted native connector.

Can Fasrad connect to my internal tools?

It can call any REST API with custom auth and browse the web, including JavaScript-heavy pages, so most systems with an API are reachable. It does not ship the deep native connectors to internal knowledge bases that Dust specializes in.

Do I need to be technical to set Fasrad up?

No. There's no flow builder, prompt engineering, or deployment. You describe what you want in plain language. Setup is about four minutes and it's in public beta.

Where does the agent run?

Web at fasrad.com/chat, as a private Telegram bot, over its own email inbox, and as a public embed chatbot on your site — the same agent and memory across all of them.

How much does it cost?

$49/month or $490/year — cancel anytime. It's in public beta, and setup takes about four minutes — no integration project to fund first.

Browse

By category

More comparisons