Relay.app gives you a node editor. Fasrad gives you an agent with its own inbox, calendar and CRM, briefed in a sentence.
Relay.app gives you a node editor and a trigger list. Fasrad gives you an agent with its own inbox, calendar and CRM that you brief in a sentence.
Relay.app is a good builder. You map a flow, drop in a trigger, wire each step to the next and add an AI step wherever you want a model to write something. Then you test until the branches behave. It works. The cost is that you've become the integration engineer, and every new case is another branch you go back and draw: a different sender, an attachment, a reply that doesn't fit the path.
Fasrad starts from the other end. You tell an agent what its job is and hand it the inbox, the sheet and the calendar. It decides the steps each time. "When a sales email lands, pull the company off their site, log the contact, and draft a reply in my voice" is the whole setup. On a canvas that's eight connected nodes plus the fallback path you forgot to add.
Where the two diverge:
Buyers usually compare these adjacent jobs before choosing an AI agent.
You port the intent. There's no flow importer, because the two models are too different, and you usually don't need one. A six-node Relay flow that triages email and drafts a reply becomes one or two sentences of instruction here, since the agent works out the steps itself. It's faster than it sounds.
Two things stand out. Relay ships a directory of prebuilt connectors to dozens of SaaS tools. Fasrad talks to Google, browses the web and calls any REST API, so it reaches systems Relay has no block for, just without a one-click catalog. And a Relay flow replays the same fixed steps every run. Fasrad's agent reads context and reasons each time. It shows its reasoning and the tools it used on every run, and you can keep a human in the loop on anything that sends or changes data.
You see it on every run: its reasoning and the tools it used. Side-effects are suppressed during its planning pass, so it plans first and then acts. For anything that sends or changes data you can keep a human in the loop. Bulk datastore changes default to a dry run, and every commit is snapshotted so you can undo it.
Yes, with the same trigger idea. new_email fires it when mail arrives, new_public_message when someone messages the embed widget, and lead_captured when a form is filled. You can also describe scheduled cron tasks into existence, and it runs proactive check-ins that aren't tied to any trigger.
Yes. One agent runs on web chat at fasrad.com/chat, as a private Telegram bot, over its own email inbox, and as a public embed chatbot you drop on your site with a script tag, lead capture and rate limiting included. Memory and tools are the same everywhere.
Start with a 7-day free trial. Full access, no card needed. Then $49 per month. Setup takes about four minutes and it's in public beta. Relay meters task runs against a monthly credit allowance, so a busy month costs more. Here you brief the agent for a flat price and don't count runs.