Tana organizes what you write down; Fasrad writes it down for you — turns a meeting thread into a linked note tied to the right contact.
An agent that reads a meeting thread, summarizes it into a linked note, and connects it to the right contact — while you're still deciding which supertag to use.
Tana is a node-based knowledge tool built around supertags: you tag a node, it inherits a schema, and your notes become a queryable graph. For people who think in structure and enjoy building the system, it's the most powerful thing in the category. The catch is that every node still starts with you typing it. Tana makes captured knowledge searchable; it doesn't do the capturing or the writing.
Fasrad starts on the other end. It has a dedicated email inbox, calendar, and CRM, so it can read the actual thread you just finished, write the summary note, attach it to the contact, and tag it — then surface it again the morning of your next meeting without being asked. The note exists because the agent created it from work that already happened, not because you sat down to log it.
Where the line falls:
Pick Tana if your goal is to build and query a personal knowledge graph and you like owning the structure. Pick Fasrad if you'd rather a hosted agent read the conversation, write the note, and link it for you — and you'd trade graph power for not doing the capture yourself.
These pages cover the adjacent jobs buyers usually compare before choosing an AI agent.
No. Fasrad has rich-text notes with @-mentions and backlinks, plus structured datastores it can create and query, but it doesn't have Tana's supertag inheritance or live node queries. If a queryable personal knowledge graph is the point, Tana is the better tool.
Structure and recall. Supertags, schema inheritance, live queries, and offline-first desktop capture are Tana's core, and they're genuinely strong. Fasrad won't model your information the way you can in Tana — its strength is acting on conversations and writing the notes for you, not letting you architect the graph.
Capture and follow-through. It reads the email thread or meeting, writes the summary note, links it to the contact, and resurfaces it before your next meeting — work that in Tana is still entirely yours to type and tag.
There's no one-click Tana importer. You can paste or upload content, and the agent can structure it into notes or a datastore, but a deep supertag graph won't map cleanly. Heavy Tana users should expect to keep Tana for the graph and use Fasrad for the doing.
No. There's no schema to design first. Connect your inbox and calendar and the agent starts producing linked notes from real conversations in about four minutes.
$49/month or $490/year — cancel anytime. It's in public beta, and setup is around four minutes.