Tana organizes what you write down. Fasrad writes it down for you.

Tana organizes what you write down; Fasrad writes it down for you — turns a meeting thread into a linked note tied to the right contact.

Get your Tana alternative now
Live in 4 minutes

An agent that reads a meeting thread, summarizes it into a linked note, and connects it to the right contact — while you're still deciding which supertag to use.

A structured graph is only as good as what you feed it

Tana is a node-based knowledge tool built around supertags: you tag a node, it inherits a schema, and your notes become a queryable graph. It's made for people who think in structure and enjoy building the system. The catch is that every node still starts with you typing it. Tana makes captured knowledge searchable; it doesn't do the capturing or the writing.

Fasrad starts on the other end. It has a dedicated email inbox, calendar, and CRM, so it can read the actual thread you just finished, write the summary note, attach it to the contact, and tag it — then surface it again the morning of your next meeting without being asked. The note exists because the agent created it from work that already happened, not because you sat down to log it.

Where the line falls:

Pick Fasrad when you'd rather a hosted agent read the conversation, write the note, and link it to the right contact for you — so the capture happens as a side effect of the work, not a thing you sit down to do.

Related pages in this workflow

These pages cover the adjacent jobs buyers usually compare before choosing an AI agent.

Frequently asked questions

Is Fasrad a knowledge graph like Tana?

No. Fasrad has rich-text notes with @-mentions and backlinks, plus structured datastores it can create and query, rather than Tana's supertag inheritance and live node queries. What Fasrad does that a graph doesn't: it reads the conversation and writes the note for you, so the capture happens on its own.

How is Tana different from Fasrad?

Tana is a structure-first knowledge graph: supertags, schema inheritance, live queries, and offline desktop capture you model yourself. Fasrad's strength is the opposite end — it acts on your conversations and writes the notes for you, reading the real email thread or meeting, summarizing it, and linking it to the contact, rather than waiting for you to architect a graph.

Where does Fasrad actually win?

Capture and follow-through. It reads the email thread or meeting, writes the summary note, links it to the contact, and resurfaces it before your next meeting — work that in Tana is still entirely yours to type and tag.

Can I move my Tana notes into Fasrad?

There's no one-click Tana importer, but you can paste or upload content and the agent will structure it into notes or a datastore — and from there it keeps the notes current by writing new ones from your real conversations, so you're not maintaining the graph by hand.

Do I have to build a structure before it's useful?

No. There's no schema to design first. Connect your inbox and calendar and the agent starts producing linked notes from real conversations in about four minutes.

How much does it cost?

$49/month or $490/year — cancel anytime. It's in public beta, and setup is around four minutes.

Browse

By category

More comparisons