An AI due diligence analyst that shows its sources

Hand it a company name, get a brief you can trust: founders, funding, and litigation flags, each with a citation behind it.

Get your Due Diligence Agent now — Live in 4 minutes

Hand it a company name; get back a structured brief with founders, funding, litigation flags, and a citation behind every claim.

Diligence is reading 40 tabs and remembering what each one said

A pre-investment screen or a vendor check starts the same way: a name, a website, and four hours of opening Crunchbase, Companies House, the trade press, an old interview write-up, and a court records portal, then trying to reconcile a founding date that three sources disagree on. The work isn't hard. It's the volume of tabs and the discipline to write down where each fact came from.

The agent runs that pass for you. Give it a company and the questions you care about, and it searches the open web, browses the pages that matter (including the JS-heavy ones that block scrapers), pulls structured data from APIs like a registry or a funding database with your own keys, and writes it up as a brief where every line traces back to a URL.

What a single run pulls together:

It is not a verdict. It's the reading and the bookkeeping done in minutes instead of an afternoon, with the citations intact so a partner or compliance reviewer can check the work instead of taking it on faith.

Related pages in this workflow

These pages cover the adjacent jobs buyers usually compare before choosing an AI agent.

Frequently asked questions

How is this different from just asking ChatGPT about a company?

A general chatbot answers from training data and will confidently state a funding round or director that's two years stale, with no source. This agent searches and browses live pages at the moment you ask, and attaches the URL behind each claim so you can check it. The point of diligence is verifiable provenance, not a fluent guess.

Can it use paid data sources we already subscribe to?

If the source has an API, yes. You connect it as a REST call with your own credentials and the agent pulls structured data from it — a company registry, a funding database, a sanctions or watchlist API. It uses your keys; we don't resell or store the data.

Does it make a buy or pass recommendation?

No, and that's deliberate. It assembles and cites the evidence so a human makes the call. It will flag thin or contradictory evidence with a confidence note, but it won't pretend a single blog post is a confirmed fact or hand you a verdict you'd then have to defend.

How does it handle conflicting information across sources?

When sources disagree — say, two founding dates or two different CEOs — it surfaces both with their citations rather than silently picking one. Its memory also flags contradictions across runs, so if last month's brief said one thing and this month's says another, you'll see it.

Can it screen a list of targets, not just one?

Yes. Drop a Sheet of company names and it works through them, writing the brief or a row of key fields back next to each one. Useful for a sourcing funnel or a vendor batch where you need the same five questions answered across thirty names.

How much does it cost?

$49/month or $490/year — cancel anytime. That covers the agent, its inbox, scheduled re-checks, and connected APIs — you bring your own keys for any paid data sources. Setup takes about four minutes, and Fasrad is in public beta.

AI research analysts by field

One research agent that searches, reads, and cites — pointed at the sources and questions your field cares about.

Browse

By category

Popular agents