Crisp answers chats. Fasrad finishes the job.

Same widget on your site — except Fasrad captures the lead, books the call, and sends the recap without a human reading the thread.

Get your Crisp alternative now — Live in 4 minutes

The same widget on your site captures the lead, checks your calendar, books the call, and sends the recap — without a human reading the thread.

Fasrad as a Crisp alternative

Crisp puts a chat bubble on your site and a shared inbox behind it. That part works. The problem is what happens after a visitor types something: the message lands in a queue, someone has to read it, decide if it's a real lead, paste a Calendly link, and remember to follow up. At 11pm or during a busy week, none of that happens, and the lead cools off.

Fasrad's embed is a <script> tag like Crisp's, but the thing behind the bubble is an agent that actually does work. It reads the question, answers from what it knows about your business, asks the two qualifying questions you'd ask, looks at your real Google Calendar, offers open slots, books the meeting, and drops the contact into your CRM with notes. No human in the loop unless you want one.

Where the line really is:

If all you need is a tidy shared inbox with a bubble, Crisp is fine and cheaper to think about. If you keep losing leads in the gap between "someone messaged us" and "someone booked," that gap is exactly what Fasrad closes.

Related pages in this workflow

These pages cover the adjacent jobs buyers usually compare before choosing an AI agent.

Frequently asked questions

We already use Crisp. What's the actual difference day to day?

With Crisp, a teammate reads each chat and decides what to do. With Fasrad, the agent decides and acts: it answers, qualifies, books the meeting in your real calendar, and files the contact. You go from staffing an inbox to reviewing what already got done.

Can Fasrad book meetings from inside the chat?

Yes — that's the core difference. It reads your Google Calendar availability live, offers open slots in the conversation, and writes the event itself. No pasted scheduling link, no "someone will get back to you."

What does Crisp still do better?

Crisp is a mature, purpose-built support desk: a polished agent inbox, canned replies, team routing, status views, and deep integrations with help-desk tooling. If your main need is a multi-agent human support team working a queue, Crisp's interface is more refined for that than Fasrad. Fasrad is for when you want the bot to take the action, not hand it to a person.

How do we migrate without losing chat history?

You don't move history into Fasrad — you run them side by side at first. Keep Crisp on the support pages where humans answer, put Fasrad's embed on the pages where you want booking and qualification. Once the booked-call numbers speak for themselves, you can consolidate. Setup is about 4 minutes.

Will it answer wrong and embarrass us?

It only answers from what you brief it on plus pages it can read, and sensitive details in the public chat are auto-redacted. You can set it to hand off to email or flag you on anything it's unsure about, so it asks instead of guessing.

What does it cost?

$49/month or $490/year — cancel anytime It's in public beta, and that one price covers the embed plus the agent's email inbox, calendar, CRM, sheets, and automations — not a per-seat support-desk plan.

Browse

By category

More comparisons